Dismissed
Prasant Ku.Hota v. RBI
Orissa HCWP(C)/20247/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner was permitted to withdraw his Writ Application. The court disposed of the application as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the Writ Application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
W.P.(C) No.20247 of 2014
¶3
Prasant Kumar Hota
¶4
…. Petitioner Mr. B.K.Nayak-1, Advocate
¶5
-versus-
¶6
Reserve Bank of India & another
¶7
…. Opposite Parties
¶8
CORAM: JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA
¶9
ORDER 30.10.2023
¶10
Order No.
¶11
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
¶12
- An oral prayer, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he is permitted to withdraw the Writ Application. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Prasant Kumar Hota
- respondent
Reserve Bank of India
Coram
AI extract
A.K. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court