Disposed

Purusottam Padhan v. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited

Orissa HC18 Apr 2023WP(C)/1676/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by following a detailed order in a related matter (W.P.(C) No. 1672 of 2019). The Court directed the matter to be adjudicated by the District Judge-cum-CBA (O) Tribunal, Jharsuguda, expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Disposed in terms of the order in W.P.(C) No. 1672 of 2019; matter referred to the District Judge-cum-CBA (O) Tribunal, Jharsuguda.

Purusottam Padhan Vs Mahanadi Coalfields Limited — Orissa HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No. 1676 of 2019

¶3

Purusottam Padhan and others

¶4

….. Petitioners

¶5

Mr. U.K. Samal, Advocate

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Mahanadi Coalfields Limited and others

¶8

….. Opposite Parties

¶9

Mr. S.D. Das, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. H. Mohanty, Advocate (O.Ps. 1 to 4) and Mr. L. Samantaray, AGA (O.P.5)

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

¶12

MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN

ORDER

18.04.2023

Order No. 04.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

It is agreed by learned counsel for the parties that this matter is analogous to W.P.(C) No. 1672 of 2019, which has been disposed today (18.04.2023) by a detailed order, and this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the said order.

¶19

In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the order dated 18.04.2023 passed in W.P.(C) No. 1672 of 2019. Accordingly, it is ordered that since the parties have agreed to refer the matter to the Competent Adjudicating Authority, i.e., the District Judgecum-CBA (O) Tribunal, Jharsuguda, in the considered opinion of this Court, the interest of justice would be best served if adhering to the provisions contained in Section 14 read with Section 17 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 the Competent Adjudicating Authority, i.e. the District Judge-cum-CBA (O) Tribunal, Jharsuguda adjudicates the matter on a reference being made by the competent

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

authority. Needless to say, since it is year old case and the petitioners are deprived of getting their legitimate claim long since, the referral authority, without causing any further delay, shall refer the matter to the Competent Adjudicating Authority, i.e. the District Judge-cum-CBA (O) Tribunal, Jharsuguda, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one month, so that the Tribunal shall do well to dispose of the same in compliance of the provisions of law governing the field, as expeditiously as possible.

¶22

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

¶23

Arun

¶24

(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE

¶25

Page 2 of 2

Purusottam Padhan v. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purusottam Padhan v. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Dhobi Dei Vs State of Orissa

Tara Tarini Rubber Vs State

Dandapani Maharatha Vs Madhusudan Padhi

Ratikanta Jena Vs Authorised Officer,State Bank of India

Jagannath Pradhan Vs Mahanadi Coalfields Limited

Kirtan Barik Vs Mahanadi Coalfields Limited