Bhupen Kumar Nayak Vs Union of India

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party no.5 to award proper valuation keeping in view the market value of the land and building under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 including the solatium as payable under Section 30 of the said Act.

¶16

Digitally ASWINI signed by ASWINI KUMA KUMAR SETHY R Date: 2023.05.05 SETHY 11:10:39 +05'30'

¶17

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that highlighting their grievance, the petitioners have made a representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-10, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time taking into consideration the Annexure-13.

¶18

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing the opposite party no.2 to dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner vide

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

Aks

¶21

Annexure-10 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law taking into consideration the Annexure-13 within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶22

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

¶23

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

¶24

(M.S. RAMAN)

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Bhupen Kumar Nayak v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhupen Kumar Nayak v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parsuram Jena Vs R.K.Goel

Bibekananda Parida Vs State

Basanti Gochhayat Vs Sidharsath Sankar Swain, I.A.S.

Binod Patra Vs State

Nabakishore Sarangi Vs State

Md.Jober Ali Vs M.C.L.