Disposed

Krushna Chandra Sahu v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC23 Jun 2023WP(C)/14352/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order directs the Secretary of the Government, School & Mass Education Department, Odisha, to decide the petitioner's representation regarding differential salary. The court issued this directive in light of specific judgments, adhering to the limited grievance by avoiding an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

The State is directed to decide the petitioner's representation within three months and pass an appropriate order.

Krushna Chandra Sahu Vs State of Orissa — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Orissa HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.14352 of 2023

¶3

Krushna Chandra Sahu

¶4

…. Petitioner Mr. B. Satapathy, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha and Others

¶7

…. Opposite Parties State Counsel

¶8

CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

23.06.2023

Order No.

03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

¶13

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶14

3. The Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite Parties to release the differential salary of the Petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.2016 to 31.08.2017 under ORSP Rules, 2017 came into force 01.01.2016 pursuant to the Resolution No.26347/F dated 07.09.2017 under Annexure-3(b) within a stipulated period.

¶15

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the Petitioner has made representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-1, but no decision has yet been taken. Therefore, the same may be considered in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in Smt. Dipti Roy - v- State of Orissa and Others , reported in 2004 (II) OLR

¶16

// 2 //

¶17

718 and Bijay Ketan Khatua -v- State of Orissa and others , reported in 2015 (I) OLR 452.

¶18

4. Considering the limited grievance of the Petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court disposes of this writ petition with a direction to the Opposite Party No.1-Secretary to Government, School & Mass Education Department, Odisha, Bhubaneswar to take a decision on the representation of the Petitioner dated 14.10.2021 as at Annexure-1 in the light of the judgments in Smt. Dipti Roy (supra) and Bijay Ketan Khatua (supra) and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of authenticated copy of this order. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge

¶19

Basudev

¶20

Signature Not Verified

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV SWAIN Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication of order Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 23-Jun-2023 16:57:51

Krushna Chandra Sahu v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krushna Chandra Sahu v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md.Mohinuddin Haroon Vs State of Orissa

Jayanti Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Biranchi Narayan Swain Vs State of Odisha

Pitabas Ratha Vs State of Odisha

Gadadhar Barik Vs State of Odisha

Surendra Prasad Nayak Vs State of Orissa