The single-judge bench observed that the writ petition was not maintainable due to the nature of the dispute. However, the court permitted its withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) NO.12902 OF 2023
Sunita Muduli
…. Petitioner
Mr.G.K.Behera, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & ors.
…. Opposite Parties
Mr.S.P.Panda, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
Order
ORDER
26.6.2023
No.
3. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
M.K.Rout
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANOJ KUMAR ROUT Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 27-Jun-2023 18:33:29
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable in respect of the nature of the dispute raised by the petitioner.
Sunita Muduli
State of Odisha
Biswanath Rath
Manoj Kumar Rout
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
