Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner’s counsel was absent on multiple hearings despite repeated calls.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.12894 of 2016
Committee Management, Bajepur Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd. Bargarh
Petitioner
None
-versus-
State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.N. Pattanaik, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No.
08.
ORDER 03.07.2023
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on repeated calls. Earlier also when the matter was listed on 22.06.2023, the Counsel for the Petitioner was found absent.
3. Mr. S.N. Pattanaik, learned Additional Government Advocate is present.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Prasant
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR PRADHAN JUDGE Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 04-Jul-2023 19:24:11
Committee Management, Bajepur Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd. Bargarh
State of Odisha
Prasant Kumar Pradhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
