The single judge disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on the ground that it had become so with the passage of time. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to revive the application if the cause of action survives.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. Liberty is granted to revive if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.12475 of 2005
Maheswar Pradhan and another Petitioners
Mr.A.K.Choudhury, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr.N.K.Praharaj, A.G.A.
Order No.
CORAM: JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA
ORDER 17.03.2023
(A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
RKS
Page 1 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the passage of time.
Maheswar Pradhan and another
State of Orissa and others
A.K. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
