The High Court of Orissa dropped the writ petition, directing the petitioners to file a separate application once an underlying appeal pending at the CGIT in Bhubaneswar is disposed of.
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to file appropriate application after disposal of related appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 10974 of 2015
Chittaranjan Bhol & Ors. …. Petitioners Mr. B.K. Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
Principal, Institute of Textile …. Opposite Parties Technology & Ors. Mr. S. Mohanty, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 1)
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER 29.11.2023
Order No
09. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard Mr. B.K. Pattanaik, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. P.K. Tripathy, learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Party Nos. 1 & 2.
3. Since the subject matter of the writ petition is dependent on the outcome of the appeal so preferred by the Opp. Party No. 1 in A.T.A. Case No. 61 of 2017, which is pending before the Presiding Officer, CGIT, Bhubaneswar, Petitioners are at liberty to file appropriate application after disposal of the appeal in question.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDADesignation: Sr. Stenographer (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Reason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Judge Date: 30-Nov-2023 19:38:52 Sneha
Sneha
Chittaranjan Bhol
Principal, Institute of Textile Technology
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
