The Court disposed of the writ petition on the ground that the brief was misplaced and no instructions were received from the petitioner.
Liberty granted to revive the writ petition if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.10602 of 2014
Mangulu Pradhan …. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Kar, Advocate
-Versus-
Chief Managing Director and Others …. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 11.04.2023
…. Opposite Parties
Order No. 05. 1. It is submitted that the brief is misplaced and there is no instruction in the matter. 2. Considering the above submission, the writ petition stands disposed of with a liberty in favour of the petitioner to revive it in the event any cause of action still survives. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
Tudu
Mangulu Pradhan
Chief Managing Director and Others
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
