The High Court held that the present writ appeal is not maintainable. The appeal is barred because the Single Judge previously exercised jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution, a bar acknowledged in the Jyotshna Mohapatra case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 372 of 2014
M/s. Chemflo Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Appellant
Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.K. Rout, Advocate
Vs.
Director of KMC Construction Ltd.
….. Respondent
Mr. U.C. Behera, Advocate
CORAM:
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
11.10.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 2
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Arun
(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ARUN KUMAR MISHRA Designation: ADR-cum-Addl. Principal Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 12-Oct-2023 16:44:18
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal was maintainable given the jurisdiction exercised under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Whether the ratio in Jyotshna Mohapatra v. State of Odisha precludes the filing of the current writ appeal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jyotshna Mohapatra v. State of OdishaAffirmed¶18
_Jyotshna Mohapatra v. State of Odisha_, 2018 (I) ILR-CUT-869 · Who else cites this
M/s. Chemflo Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Director of KMC Construction Ltd.
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Mr. Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
