In a writ appeal regarding a tenure matter, the single-judge bench dismissed a delay condonation application under Section 137 CrPC for 165 days. Citing a related apex Court order, the Court refused to entertain the appeal and dismissed both the application and the appeal.
Application for condonation of delay dismissed; Writ Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No.1595 of 2022
State of Odisha and others ….. Appellants Mr. R.N. Mishra, AGA
Vs.
Dr.Nalini Prava Behera & another ….. Respondents
CORAM:
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
05.10.2023 I.A. No.3739 of 2022
Order No. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 02.
Page 1 of 2
MRS
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 06-Oct-2023 14:10:03
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 165 days in preferring a writ appeal due to lack of sufficient cause and due diligence.
Whether to entertain a writ appeal dismissed in a related proceeding confirmed by the apex Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari DasExplained¶15
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das
S.L.P.(C) Diary No. 9259 of 2023Explained¶15
State of Odisha
Dr. Nalini Prava Behera
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Murahari S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
