Dismissed
Nidhiram v. Gajendra
Orissa HCSA/206/1987
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa disposed of an appeal as abated. The sole respondent had expired since 2000, and no legal representatives were substituted, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as abated due to the death of the sole respondent without substitution of legal representatives.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
SA No.206 of 1987
¶3
Nidhiram Samal Appellant(s) None
¶4
-versus-
¶5
Gajendra Naik (dead)
¶6
…. Respondent(s)
¶7
Mr. R.K. Mohanty, Sr. Counsel.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
MR. JUSTICE A.C. BEHERA
¶10
ORDER
¶11
Order No.
¶12
18.10.2023
¶13
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Nidhiram Samal
- respondent
Gajendra Naik (dead)
Coram
AI extract
A.C. Behera
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court