The High Court of Orissa dismissed a review petition filed against an order dated 28.02.2023 in W.P.(C) No. 9779 of 2019. The Court held that the petitioners exhausted the alternative remedy and had no grounds for review.
The review petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RVWPET No. 118 OF 2023
Shyama Sundar Khuntia and others
….. Petitioners
Mr. S. N. Mishra, Advocate
Vs.
Punjab National Bank & others
….. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
04.08.2023
Order No. I.A. No. 158 of 2023
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. SAHOO)
JUDGE
Order No. RVWPET No. 118 of 2023
03.
Page 1 of 2
as because when alternative remedy was availble to the petitioners, they should not have appraoched this Court directly instead of availing the alternative remedy.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Arun
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ARUN KUMAR MISHRA Designation: ADR-cum-Addl. Principal Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 07-Aug-2023 14:17:02
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition seeking review of the order dated 28.02.2023 in W.P.(C) No. 9779 of 2019 is maintainable when the petitioners availed alternative remedy directly.
Shyama Sundar Khuntia and others
Punjab National Bank
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Mr. Justice M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
