State Bank of India v. Janamajaya Behera
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RSA No.131…
What did the court decide?
RSA disposed of as not pressed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RSA No.131 of 2020
State Bank of India …. Petitioner
Mr. P.V. Balakrishna, Advocate
-versus-
Kumari Swarnalata Behera & another
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
Order No.
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 13.05.2023 This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Mr. P.V. Balakrishna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the decreetal amount has already been paid and therefore, he does not want to press this appeal.
In view of such submission, the RSA stands disposed of as not pressed.
( S.K.Sahoo, J .) 2nd National Lok Adalat
PKSahoo
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRAMOD KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 16-May-2023 10:21:51
State Bank of India
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court