Special Leave Petition filed to challenge an ex-parte order directing maintenance payments in a family dispute was dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution after the petitioner did not appear. The conditional interim order was vacated.
RPFAM dismissed for non-prosecution; conditional interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 62 of 2016
Chintamani Maharana and another …. Petitioners
None
-versus-
Kasinath Maharana and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pradhan, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
13.02.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 1 of 1
Chintamani Maharana
Kasinath Maharana
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
