The High Court dismissed the RPFAM filed by the petitioner to quash an order for notice to realize maintenance arrears. The court observed that due to the petitioner's inaction over ten years, nothing remained to be adjudicated.
The RPFAM stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 54 OF 2012
Nanda Kishore Sahoo
…. Petitioner None
-versus-
Mamata Sahoo
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
06.02.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a RPFAM filed to quash the issuance of summons and notice against the petitioner for maintenance arrears should be decided after a lapse of ten years due to inaction by the petitioner.
Whether the RPFAM needs adjudication given the petitioner's failure to remove defects or get the matter listed for over a decade.
Nanda Kishore Sahoo
Mamata Sahoo
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
