The RPFAM petition was filed to challenge a Family Court judgment refusing maintenance to a petitioner and directing the opposite party to pay maintenance to a minor son. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no advocate appeared for the petitioners.
RPF_AM petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 53 OF 2012
Smt. Sukanti Singh and another
…. Petitioners None
-versus-
Niranjan Sahoo
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
07.02.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition arising out of a maintenance order is maintainable when the petitioners have failed to appear at the call.
Smt. Sukanti Singh
Another
Niranjan Sahoo
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
