Petitioner filed an application challenging a Family Court judgment directing maintenance payment. The applicant had no instruction, leading to dismissal for nonprosecution.
The RPFAM stands dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 20 OF 2014
Pratap Kumar Khilar @ Pratap Khilar …. Petitioner
Mr. Prajit Kumar Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
Hemalata Behera …. Opp. Party None
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
21.02.2023
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
Pratap Kumar Khilar @ Pratap Khilar
Hemalata Behera
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
