The High Court at Cuttack dismissed the Petitioner's RPFAM under Section 153A CrPC for non-prosecution, as no advocate appeared on his behalf to contest the Family Court's maintenance order.
RPFAM dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 19 OF 2008
Nityananda Panda
…. Petitioner
None
-versus-
Suchitra Ratha @ Panda
…. Opp. Party Mr. B.K. Routray, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
16.02.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra)
ms
Judge
Page 1 of 1
Nityananda Panda
Suchitra Ratha @ Panda
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
