The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed a review petition filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for non-prosecution as the petitioners did not appear on behalf of the matter during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 132 OF 2012
Laxmipriya Barik and another …. Petitioners None
-versus-
Krushna Chandra Barik
…. Opp. Party Mr. P.K. Rath, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
02.02.2023
in Criminal Petition No.377 of 2011 is under challenge in this RPFAM, whereby learned Judge, Family Court, Khurda partly allowed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioners refusing to grant of maintenance to Petitioner No.1 and directing the Opposite Party to pay Rs.1,000/- per month to Petitioner No.2 from the date of filing of the application.
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
Laxmipriya Barik
Krushna Chandra Barik
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
