The High Court of Orissa allowed the Regular Bail Application on the basis of a settled compromise between parties. The lower court’s order accepting the compromise petition was recorded, and the appeal was disposed of.
The Regular Bail Application was disposed of as the matter was settled by compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RFA No.72 of 2005
…. Maguni Charana Kamala and Appellants Another
Mr. S.K. Padhi, Advocate
-versus-
Smt. Shantilata Kamala and …. Respondents Another
Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 20.11.2023
Order No.
“The record is put up today in the eve of 3rd National lok Adalat. Parties have already been asked and submitted to have voluntarily signed on the compromise petition of dtd.05.09.2023, having understood its terms and contents. This is a final decree proceeding arising out of C.S. No. 24/212 of 2003/2001 for partition. Perused the terms and conditions of the compromise petition, which appears to be legal. Hence, the compromise petition is accepted and the final decree proceeding is accordingly disposed of as per the terms
Page 1 of 2
of compromise. The Compromise petition is do part of the Final Decree.”
Ayesha
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 21-Nov-2023 18:04:45
Page 2 of 2
Maguni Charana Kamala
Shantilata Kamala
V. Narasinh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
