M/S.F.I.Ltd v. S.T.O.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner joined this writ petition, but the Second Appeal from which it arose was already disposed of, rendering this petition infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
O.J.C. No.5370 of 1997
M/s. Frick India Ltd.
..……. Petitioner
Mr. R.P. Kar, Advocate
-Versus-
The Sales Tax Officer, Bhubaneswar-I
Circle, Bhubaneswar & others ..……. Opp. Parties Mr. S.S. Padhi, Standing Counsel for the CT & GST Department
CORAM: JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 03.04.2023
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. Mr. R.P. Kar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the Second Appeal out of which, this writ petition emerges, has been disposed of and as such, this writ petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Frick India Ltd.
- respondent
The Sales Tax Officer, Bhubaneswar-I
Coram
S. Talapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court