Dismissed
Rangadhar Behera v. Umesh Ch.Jena
Orissa HCMACA/878/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In the absence of the appellant's appearance, the appeal filed under MACA No.878 of 2014 was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
MACA No.878 of 2014
¶3
…. Rangadhar Behera Appellant None
¶4
-versus-
¶5
Umesh Chandra Jena and another
¶6
…. Respondents
¶7
CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
¶8
ORDER 17.07.2023
¶9
Order No.
¶11
- None appears on call for the Appellant.
2. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
¶12
B.K. Barik
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Rangadhar Behera
- respondent
Umesh Chandra Jena and another
Coram
AI extract
B.P. Routray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court