The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack heard an appeal where the appellant's counsel submitted no instruction and no steps were taken for limitation. The court dismissed the appeal on the ground of limitation.
The appeal is dismissed on the ground of limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MACA No.767 of 2008
…. Indramoni Nayak & Anr. Appellants Mr.P.K.Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
…. Rajib Shivhare & Anr. Respondents
CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 18.04.2023
Order No.
S.Das
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is barred by limitation?
Indramoni Nayak & Anr.
Rajib Shivhare & Anr.
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
