The single judge, hearing the case via hybrid mode, dismissed the appeal because it was presented as not pressed by the appellant on the date of hearing.
The appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.503 of 2022
Gopinath Das and Others
…. Appellants
Mr. P.K. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Chhitaranjan Samal and Another
…. Respondents
Mr. P.K. Mahali, counsel for Respondent No.2
CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
Order No.
M.K.Panda
ORDER
13.4.2023
Gopinath Das and Others
Chhitaranjan Samal
Another
B. P. Routray
M. K. Panda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
