Rs.5,000/- as monthly income of the victim and accordingly after deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses of the deceased a sum of Rs.3,750/- has been taken into consideration while calculating the compensation. Learned counsel for the Appellant further objected to application of ‘12’ as a multiplier by the learned Tribunal in the present case. He further stated that keeping in view the fact that the age of the victim was 27 years at the time of accident, the learned Tribunal had applied ‘12’ as a multiplier instead of ‘18’ as a multiplier. He further contended that the amount awarded is lower in side, inadequate and unsustainable in the eye of law. Finally, it was submitted that the total compensation amount of Rs.5,50,000/- in case of death is grossly inadequate. Hence, a prayer was made for enhancement of the quantum of compensation.