This order dismisses a writ appeal and a miscellaneous case due to excessive delay of 376 days in filing the appeal, holding the ground of limitation bar applies.
Both the Misc. Case and the appeal are dismissed on the grounds of limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MACA No.1140 of 2012
Prasanna Kumar Patra
…. Appellant Mr. B.N. Rath, Advocate
-versus-
…. Respondents Mr. S.R. Ojha, Advocate for Respondent No.2
Rahtun Bibi and another
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
25.07.2023
Order No.
M.C. No.175 of 2014 and MACA No.1140 of 2012
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
B.K. Barik
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BASANTA KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 28-Jul-2023 10:42:02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 376 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Prasanna Kumar Patra
Rahtun Bibi and another
B. P. ROUTRAY
B. K. BARIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
