Dismissed
Sk.Rustam v. Balaram Padhi
Orissa HCMA/162/2002
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution as none of the appellants appeared on call despite the matter having been passed over.
What did the court decide?
None. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of appellants.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MA No.162 of 2002
¶2
Sk. Rustam and others …. Appellants None
¶3
-versus-
¶4
Balaram Padhi and another
¶5
…. Respondents
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
¶8
Order No.
¶10
ORDER
13.03.2023
1. None appears for the Appellants on call despite the matter was
passed over.
2. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
¶11
B.K. Barik
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sk. Rustam and others
- respondent
Balaram Padhi and another
Coram
AI extract
B. P. Routray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court