11. Further, the question on credibility of such declaration depends on its degree to which it is entitled to be accepted in circumstances of the case. In the instant case, what is seen that it is natural on the part of the father, brother and other relatives of the deceased to reach at the deceased at the first instance. P.W.1, 2, 3 and others when reached near the deceased upon receipt of information over phone regarding his bleeding condition, the deceased narrated the incident before them how the Appellant shot the arrow to him. It is not that, the injury was inflicted on such comparatively vital organ that could have disabled him from speaking anything instantly. The circumstances reveal that he was lying on the road in bleeding condition and rescued by his relatives to his house, and while arranging to shift him to medical, he succumbed to the injuries. Thus upon close analysis of the circumstances, nothing remains suspicious to disbelieve or doubt on the statement made by the deceased before the witnesses. Therefore, what is narrated by all such witnesses regarding the oral statement of the deceased narrated towards his cause of death is found completely believable. In Prakash and another vrs. State of Madhya Pradesh , (1992) 4 SCC 225 , the Supreme Court has observed as follows:-
