Dismissed
Union of India v. Lakhi Muchahari
Orissa HCFAO/71/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
FaO No.71 of 2016 was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear on the day of hearing.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
FAO No.71 of 2016
¶3
Union of India, represented through the General Manager, East Coast …. Railway, Chandrasekharpur, BBSR Appellant
¶4
None appears
¶5
-versus-
¶6
Smt. Lakhi Muchahari and Another
¶7
…. Respondents
¶8
Mr. K. Panigrahi, counsel for Respondents 1 & 2
¶9
CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
¶10
- ORDER 3.4.2023
¶11
- Order No.
¶12
- The matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. None appears on call for the Appellant. 3. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. ( B.P. Routray)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Union of India
- respondent
Smt. Lakhi Muchahari
Coram
AI extract
B. P. Routray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court