The court disposed of an appeal challenging a high percentage fixed deposit direction for compensation, aligning with a prior judgment to disburse the entire amount while retaining 50% shares in fixed deposits.
Directs entire compensation be disbursed with 50% shares of Appellants kept in separate 5-year fixed deposits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No.169 of 2023
Durgavati Devi and another
…. Appellants Mr. D. Patnaik, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India
…. Respondent Mrs. J. Sahu, C.G.C. for UoI
CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
06.04.2023
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
deposits in any Nationalized Bank in their names for a period of five years.
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
B.K. Barik
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal challenging the direction to keep 90% of compensation in fixed deposit is covered by a previous judgment.
Whether the compensation should be disbursed to claimants with a modified fixed deposit arrangement.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
FAO No.262 of 2020 and batch, disposed of on 9th September, 2021Followed¶3
Durgavati Devi
Satyanarayan Sahu
Union of India
B.P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
