State v. Alok Ch.Mohanty
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant challenged an order of the Tribunal which the respondent argued had already been implemented. The Court found the appeal infructuous since the benefit was already received and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The First Appeal is disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
FAO No.151 of 2008
State of Orissa & Another
…. Appellants Mr. S.K. Samal, AGA
-versus-
Alok Chandra Mohanty & …. Respondents Another Mr.S.K.Das, Adv. for Respondent No.1
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
05.04.2023
Order No
04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard Mr. S.K. Samal, learned Addl. Government Advocate appearing for the Appellants and Mr. S.K. Das, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Orissa & Another
- respondent
Alok Chandra Mohanty
Coram
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court