This petition allowed the dispossession of a criminal revision petition filed after a 12-year delay. The court held that the petition would not survive adjudication.
CRLREV No.95 of 2011 and Misc. Case No.123 of 2011 disposed of as the petition would not survive adjudication after 12 years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No.95 of 2011
Rabindra Digal
Petitioner
Ms. Sujata Jena, Advocate
-versus-
Tangara Kanhar and others ….
Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
01.11.2023
Order No.
Hybrid Mode
Misc. Case No.123 of 2011
In the meanwhile, 12 years have passed.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOSTNARANI MAJHEEReason: Authentication (M.S. Sahoo) Location: OHCDate: 03-Nov-2023 13:09:28 Judge jyostna
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow a criminal revision petition filed after a delay of 12 years.
Whether the petition survives for adjudication after such a lapse of time.
Rabindra Digal
Tangara Kanhar
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
