Dismissed
Balmiki Nayak v. Sasmita Nayak
Orissa HCCRLREV/856/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRL REV No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRL REV No. 856 of 2013
Balmiki Nayak …. Petitioner
Mr. P.K.Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
Sasmita Nayak & another …. Opp.Parties
Mr. R. Behera on behalf
of Mr. P.S.Nayak, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
14.11.2023
Order No. Hybrid Mode
11 . 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner
does not want to prosecute the present petition. Memo dated
14.11.2023 filed on behalf of the petitioner stating the same is
taken on record.
2. The petition stands disposed of.
………………………
(M.S.Sahoo)
Judge
dutta
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AJIT KUMAR DUTTA Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: ohc Date: 17-Nov-2023 19:00:47
Balmiki Nayak
Sasmita Nayak
M.S.Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court