This CRLMP complained of improper investigation. The Court refused to exercise plenary jurisdiction, citing effective statutory remedy available under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., and disposed of the petition.
Liberty granted to move the learned Magistrate concerned under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 564 of 2023
Snehalata Barik
…. Petitioner
Mr. B. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 30.10.2023 Order No. 05. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKADesignation: Senior Stenographer (V. NARASINGH) Reason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of Orissa Judge Date: 31-Oct-2023 18:11:44 Santoshi
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its plenary jurisdiction to entertain a CRLMP regarding improper investigation giving effective statutory remedy.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe vrs. Hemant Yashwant Dhage and othersReferred¶3
(2016) 6 SCC 277 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Snehalata Barik
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
