The Court directed the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cuttack, to decide on a complaint regarding the non-registration of an FIR for a cognizable offence.
The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cuttack is directed to take a decision on the complaint within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 1558 of 2023
Jyosnarani Sethi
…. Petitioner
Mr. S.B. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
23.11.2023
Order No.
03. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned
counsel for State.
Page 1 of 2
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Soumya
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 25-Nov-2023 11:16:05
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police must register an FIR on cognizable information disclosed in a complaint.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of U.P. & othersReferred¶3
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of U.P. & others, AIR 2014 SC 187 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jyosnarani Sethi
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
V. NARASINGH
Parties & counsel
