The High Court reserved a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition where the petitioner complained of police inaction despite a civil court order and Superintendent of Police's direction to take steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 1076 of 2023
Dibakar Behera
Petitioner
Mr. B.S. Dasparida, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 07.11.2023 Order No. 03. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Page 1 of 2
and ensure that such grievance is redressed within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with CRLMP more so, in view of the direction of Superintendent of Police already passed and noted herein above.
the State to enable him to take necessary follow up action.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Santoshi
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 08-Nov-2023 19:04:20
Page 2 of 2
Dibakar Behera
State of Odisha
V. Narasimh
Santoshi Lenka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
