In a contempt inquiry cum MP under Rule 6 of CPC, the petitioner complained of inaction by Vigilance Authorities regarding alleged irregularities in construction. The Court noted that a representation had been received and investigation ensued, thus disposing of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No.1044 of 2023
Jayanta Kumar Swain …. Petitioner
Mr. K. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
Ms. J.R. Tripathy, Adv.(Vigilance)
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
08.11.2023
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
Ayesha
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 09-Nov-2023 18:47:31
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to pass a further order after representation for investigation into alleged irregularities was taken up by Vigilance Authorities.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jayanta Kumar Swain
State of Odisha
V. Narasimh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
