In a CRLMC regarding an offence likely under NDPS/IPC, the High Court considered joint submissions that the petitioner and victim married and have a child, accepting this as a compromise and quashing the proceeding.
Quashing of the NCRMC and direction to conclude trial within 3 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.72 of 2016
Raghu Bhat Padi @ Butpodia
… Petitioner
Mr. D.R. Bhokta, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and Others
… Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Pattnaik, AGA Mr. S.K. Das, Adv(O.P.2)
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
21.03.2023
Order No.
08. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
Page 1 of 2
petitioner has been charged, prays that the present proceeding cannot be quashed.
(G. Satapathy)
Judge
Subhasmita
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal proceeding should be quashed where the petitioner and victim have reconciled.
Raghu Bhat Padi @ Butpodia
State of Orissa and Others
O.P.No.2-victim
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
