The Single Judge admitted the petition to raise pleas and disposed of it without pronouncing on the quashing prayer, directing the order be communicated to the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.532 of 2023
Gouribala Patro and others
…. Petitioners
M/s. S. Satapathy and associates, Advocates
-versus-
State of Odisha and another
…. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Mohanty, A.S.C. for the State
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
10.05.2023
“It is therefore prayed that let the Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the order dt.05.12.2019 as per Annexure-1 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1577 of 2019 arising out of Berhampur Mahila P.S. Case No.87 of 2019 which is pending in the court of the S.D.J.M., Berhampur. xxx”
present petition before the trial Court at the appropriate stage, the petition is disposed of. A copy of this order be communicated to the concerned trial Court forthwith.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
M. Panda
MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA
Digitally signed by MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA Date: 2023.05.11 10:21:59 +05'30'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the impugned order dt.05.12.2019 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1577 of 2019 arising out of Berhampur Mahila P.S. Case No.87 of 2019.
Gouribala Patro and others
State of Odisha and another
Dr. S. Muralidhar
Mrutunjaya Panda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
