This single judge order dismissed the Criminal Remedy Measure challenging the ASJ's rejection of a Section 311 Cr.P.C. application to recall prosecution witnesses. The court found the application did not meet Section 303 Cr.P.C. standards and found no legal infirmity in the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1618 of 2023
Prafulla Sethi @ Prafulla Kumar Sethi …. Petitioners and others
Mr. S. Harichandan, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Mohanty, A.S.C. for the State
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
18.05.2023
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
Signature Not Verified
S.K. Guin
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBASH KUMAR GUIN Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 19-May-2023 11:17:53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for recall of prosecution witnesses after trial concludes was based on legal infirmity.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Prafulla Sethi @ Prafulla Kumar Sethi and others
State of Odisha
Chief Justice
S.K. Guin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
