Ankit Khandelwal v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The Criminal Miscellaneous Commission petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of as the counsel for the petitioner chose to withdraw the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 1308 of 2022
Ankit Khandelwal
Petitioner
Mr. L.N. Rayatsingh, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. A.K. Nayak, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
29.11.2023
Order No.
11. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed a memo stating
therein that he wants to withdraw this CRLMC.
2. Accordingly, the CRLMC stands disposed of as
withdrawn.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Santoshi
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 01-Dec-2023 13:12:35
Page 1 of 1
Ankit Khandelwal
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court