Rabindra Kumar Sahoo v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
In an appeal against bail rejection, the High Court of Orissa directed the release of appellant no.1 on bail considering the nature of the fatal assault charge and detention period, while denying immediate bail to appellant no.2 accused of using a weapon, granting liberty to renew the prayer post-eye-witness examination.
What did the court decide?
Appellant no.1 released on bail with a bond of Rs.50,000 and conditions; liberty granted to Appellant no.2 to renew bail prayer after trial court's eye-witness examination.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLA No.126 of 2023
1. Rabindra Kumar Sahoo
2. Chaitanya Sahoo
Appellants
Mr. Devashis Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Order No.
State of Odisha & another
…. Respondents
Mr. Rajesh Tripathy
Addl. Standing Counsel
Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate for
the Respondent no.2
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
ORDER
01.05.2023
This matter is taken up through Hybrid
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant no.1 should be released on bail considering the nature of accusation against him for giving physical blows and the duration of his detention.
Whether the bail prayer of the appellant no.2 should be dismissed at this stage due to the specific allegation that he used a wooden plank in the assault.
Whether liberty is granted to the appellant no.2 to renew his bail prayer after examination of eye witnesses in the trial court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rabindra Kumar Sahoo
- appellant
Chaitanya Sahoo
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court