The contempt petition was disposed of as not pressed at the hearing when the petitioner's counsel filed a memo withdrawing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC(CPC) NO.73 of 2000
President of Samal …. Petitioner Barrage Employees Union Mr. D.R. Ray, Adv.
-versus-
Srinibas Rath, Principal …. Opposite Parties Secy, W.R. Deptt Mr. H.K. Panigrahi, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
27.06.2023
Order No
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner files a memo in Court today stating therein that the does not want to press the Contempt Petition. The memo be kept on record.
3. In view of such submission, the CONTC. is disposed of as not pressed.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
sangita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authentication of order Location: High Court of orissa, C uttac k Date: 12-Jul-2023 12:41:25
President of Samal Barrage Employees Union
Srinibas Rath
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
