Petitioner filed a contempt petition under Cont. No.920 of 2014. Court observed that by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.920 of 2014
Prasanna Kumar Das
….. Petitioner
Mr. R. Samal, Advocate
Vs.
Dr. Krishna Kumar, IAS & ….. another
Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
16.05.2023
03.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of
time, the contempt petition has become infructuous.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
MRS JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSITANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 16-May-2023 16:10:48
Prasanna Kumar Das
Dr. Krishna Kumar, IAS
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
