Aditya N.Rath v. Ashok Ku.Tripathy
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition in which the petitioner's counsel stated having no instructions. The High Court disposed of the petition for want of instructions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.82 of 2013
Aditya Narayan Rath
….. Petitioner
Mr. A.K. Mohapatra, Advocate
Vs.
Ashok Kumar Tripathy, Secretary, Bhubaneswar
….. Opposite Party
Mr. L. Samantray, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aditya Narayan Rath
- respondent
Ashok Kumar Tripathy
Coram
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court