The Contempt No.620 of 2017 before the High Court of Orissa was dismissed as infructuous based on the submission by the petitioner's counsel that the matter had become infructuous.
The Contempt No.620 of 2017 stands dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.620 of 2017
M/s. Binodini Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
….. Petitioner
Mr. P.R. Patnaik, Advocate
Vs.
Debendra Kumar Seth, Executive ….. Opposite party Engineer (Rural Works Division) Mr.L. Samantray, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
03.04.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
3.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter
has become infructuous.
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Binodini Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
Debendra Kumar Seth
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
