This judgment disposes of a contempt petition filed for non-compliance of a court order by granting the opposite parties (contemnors) an extension of one month to comply with the previous order, with a warning that further non-compliance constitutes a deliberate violation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.541 of 2023
Umesh Chandra Mishra
Petitioner
-versus-
Aswathy S., I.A.S & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
14.02.2023
Order No 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2 . Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
3. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner for non-compliance of the order dated 04.08.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.32699 of 2021.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Contempt Petition is disposed of by granting one month further time to the opposite parties - contemnors to comply the order passed on 04.08.2022. However, if the order is not complied with within the extended time, it will be held as deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Petitioner in a contempt petition seeking compliance of a previous order should be granted additional time to comply, and under what conditions the extension can be withdrawn if not compli
Umesh Chandra Mishra
Aswathy S.
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
