Petitioner raised no instruction to oppose the contempt proceedings. Advance Government Advocate for the State informed that the previous contempt order was complied with, leading to the dropping of the proceeding.
Contempt proceeding stands dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.2169 of 2011
Prahallad Panda
….. Petitioner Mr. K.K. Swain, Advocate
Vs.
Chandra Sekhar Kumar, IAS & ….. Opposite Parties another
Mr. L. Samantaray, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
26.04.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 08. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction in the matter.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (M.S. RAMAN) MRS JUDGE
Prahallad Panda
Chandra Sekhar Kumar
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
