The High Court of Orissa, in this CMAPL, allowed the appeal and restored it, permitting the matter to proceed. No substantive legal propositions or details on the specific grounds for restoration were provided in the order.
The CMAPL is allowed and the appeal is restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMAPL No.111 of 2023
Union of India
…. Appellant Ms.S.Patra, CGC
-versus-
…. Tasil Minja & Ors. Respondents Mr.D.Munda, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 05.07.2023
Order No.
(B.P. Routray)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS S.Das Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 06-Jul-2023 16:30:47
Union of India
Tasil Minja & Ors.
B. P. ROUTRAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
